Battle of Orgreave inquiry ruled out

Orgreave confrontationImage copyright
PA

Image caption

Thousands of miners and around 6,000 police officers clashed at the Orgreave coking site near Rotherham in June 1984

There will be no inquiry into the notorious events at the so-called “Battle of Orgreave”, Home Secretary Amber Rudd has announced.

Thousands of miners and police clashed at the Yorkshire coking site in 1984.

Campaigners said officers led by South Yorkshire Police were heavy-handed and manufactured statements.

However, Mrs Rudd said she did not believe there was “sufficient basis… to instigate either a statutory inquiry or an independent review”.

Media captionChris Matheson accuses Amber Rudd of “leading families up the garden path” after she says there will be “no statutory inquiry or independent review”

Shadow home secretary Diane Abbott described the decision as a “grave injustice”, while Andy Burnham MP called it an “establishment stitch-up”.

Barbara Jackson, secretary of the Orgreave Truth and Justice Campaign, said the announcement had come as a “complete shock and a great disappointment”.

Meanwhile Louise Haigh MP accused Mrs Rudd of misleading campaigners over a possible inquiry.

For live updates and more from across South Yorkshire

Image copyright
Rex Features

In a written statement, Mrs Rudd said: “Despite the forceful accounts and arguments provided by the campaigners and former miners who were present that day about the effect that these events have had on them, ultimately there were no deaths or wrongful convictions.”

Calls for an Orgreave inquiry escalated following the conclusion of the two-year Hillsborough inquests, which provided a scathing assessment of the under-fire South Yorkshire Police force’s behaviour.

What was the ‘Battle of Orgreave’?

Orgreave: The battle that’s not over

The statement added: “The campaigners say that had the consequences of the events at Orgreave been addressed properly at the time, the tragic events at Hillsborough would never have happened five years later.

“That is not a conclusion which I believe can be reached with any certainty.”

Image copyright
John Harris/Report Digital

The Battle of Orgreave was the most violent day of the year-long 1984-85 miners’ strike.

Huge lines of police clashed with striking miners as they tried to stop lorries carrying coke to fuel the Scunthorpe steel furnaces.

Violence erupted on both sides and at one stage police horses were sent to charge the crowd up the field as officers followed to make arrests.

The police said they were hit by rocks and bottles and had to react to protect themselves. The miners said they were peacefully protesting when the police charged.

Mrs Rudd acknowledged her decision would be a “significant disappointment” to the Orgreave Truth And Justice Campaign, but said a raft of “very significant changes” to policing since 1984 meant there would be “very few lessons to be learned”.

Media captionThe home secretary is accused by Andy Burnham of an “establishment stitch-up” over events during the Miners’ Strike

However, Mr Burnham said: “Given that the IPCC found evidence of perjury and perverting the course of justice, and given that in the last month new evidence has emerged from former police officers who were at Orgreave of orchestrated violence and the mass manufacture of police statements, aren’t we right in concluding that the establishment stitch-up that she has just announced today is nothing more than a naked political act?”

Mrs Rudd said he was “entirely wrong”, accusing him of choosing to “politicise” the decision.

She added: “Just because I have made a decision with which he disagrees, does not mean it is the wrong decision.”

Mrs Jackson told the BBC the decision meant there would be “no transparency, no accountability, no truth and no justice”.

“It’s a complete and utter shock to us that we are getting nothing after campaigning for four years,” she said.

“So it’s OK that you get beaten up and seriously injured, but so long as you don’t die the police don’t have to be held accountable.”

She said the campaign groups lawyers would be looking at Mrs Rudd’s decision to see if there was room to mount a legal challenge.

Image caption

Police held back striking miners who were attempting to stop lorries of coke leaving Orgreave coking plant for steel works

Labour MP for Bolsover, Dennis Skinner, described the announcement as contrary to that of Prime Minister and former Home Secretary Theresa May.

Mrs Rudd, however, said that there had been “no commitment made before, only a willingness to look at the evidence”.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said he was “astonished” and re-committed a Labour government to holding a full inquiry.

He said: “Campaigns for justice never go away.”

Media captionLabour leader Jeremy Corbyn ‘astonished’ by lack of Orgreave inquiry

Speaking outside Parliament, Ms Haigh said: “I absolutely think [Mrs Rudd] misled us [when she met with campaigners in September].

“Her exact words were, she had to decide what format it would take. It wasn’t a question for us of whether or not it would happen, it was in what form it would take.”

It is believed that the Home Office disputes the allegation.

Lord Tebbit, who was Trade and Industry Secretary during the miner’s strike, however, has welcomed the decision.

He said: “I don’t see there’s anything to inquire about.

“It doesn’t seem to make any sense to give a lot of money to a lot of rich lawyers to drag it out, month after month, smiling away as they pocket their fat fees.

“We know what happened. The police behaved pretty well on the whole under very great provocation. And the pickets behaved very badly in trying to stop men from going to work.”


Analysis: Dominic Casciani – Home Affairs Correspondent

Ministers can order public inquiries into events that in the commendably simply legal jargon have caused “public concern”.

On that basis alone, the Orgreave campaigners will say they have been denied justice. In practice, it’s pretty tough to get an inquiry launched.

All recent major inquiries have shared a number of critical factors that boil down to serious allegations of the state failing ordinary people in catastrophic circumstances.

Hillsborough was about the deaths of innocent people.

The troubled Child Sexual Abuse inquiry will look at alleged corruption at the highest levels of government.

The controversial probe into undercover policing, starting next year, came after serious miscarriages of justice and allegations of spying on Stephen Lawrence’s family.

In each case, ministers have accepted lessons still need to be learned and potential wrongs righted.

Any ministerial decision can be challenged – so the question now is whether campaigners think they’ve got a case to take her to court.


South Yorkshire Police and Crime Commissioner Dr Alan Billings said he was “shocked and dismayed” by the decision.

He said: “The government has marched the Campaign for Truth and Justice to the top of the hill, only to march it down again.

“The former miners and the former mining communities in South Yorkshire deserve an explanation as to what happened on that day and where Orgreave fits in the wider story of the miners’ strike.

“I believe the government has shied away from agreeing an inquiry because of those wider issues.”

Hillsborough campaigner Margaret Aspinall said she believed Mrs Rudd should have ordered a public inquiry.

“There’s not going to be what the Hillsborough families had, which was an independent inquiry,” she said.

“I think that they should have at least the same. I think it’s a real big, big disappointment.”

Battle of Orgreave inquiry ruled out}

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.